Answer:
You pay your neighbor $400 to cut the tree down.
Explanation:
You pay your neighbor $400 to cut the tree down.
The amount paid to the neighbor is to be more than the value of the tree as your neighbour values and this will satisfy as per the Coase Theorem which states that amount paid for the damage caused due to negative externality should be more than the value that the person attaches to production of externality.Also, it is to be lower than the cost which the person has to bear because of mango production and thus as a result both gain $100 in the process.
Answer:
$51.22
Explanation:
For computing the intrinsic value, first we have to determine the current year dividend and expected rate of return which is shown below:
The computation of the next year dividend is shown below:
= $3 + $3 × 3.8%
= $3 + 0.114
= $3.114
And, the expected rate of return would be
= Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
= 2.4% + 0.88 × (10.9% - 2.4%)
= 2.4% + 0.88 × 8.5%
= 2.4% + 7.48%
= 9.88%
Now the intrinsic value would be
= Next year dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
= $3.114 ÷ (9.88% - 3.8%)
= $3.114 ÷ 6.08%
= $51.22
Answer: template method
Explanation:
The bottom-up approach for estimating times and costs that uses costs from past projects that were similar to the current project is known as template method.
It should be noted that estimating time and cost are vital because it helps schedule work, develop needs of cash flow and show progress of a project.
Answer:
D) being unable to engage in all three of the above activities.
Explanation:
An opportunity cost is the cost (or lost benefit) of choosing one activity or investment over another. In this case, if the student decides to attend afternoon class, he/she will not be able to benefit from:
- taking a nap
- seeing a movie with a friend
- studying for next morning's test
So all the three activities represent the opportunity cost of attending afternoon class.
The type of business that Wally is proposing in the scenario above is partnership. There are three different type of partnership,they are: limited partnership, limited liability partnership and general partnership. Each of these three types provides partners with different level of liability. Thus, Wally was wrong when he said that there could be no personal liability for debts.
