1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol [13]
3 years ago
5

Aggressive marketing in the context of format wars: a. does not encompass point-of-sales promotion techniques. b. deters early a

dopters. c. usually triggers a negative feedback loop. d. helps a company jump-start demand. e. results in lower emphasis on killer applications.
Business
1 answer:
Dvinal [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Helps a company jump-start demand

Explanation:

Format war in business is defined as competition for market dominance between producers of a particular type of technology with closely related functions.

Aggressive marketing are strategies employed to gain and ensure survival in a new market.

A typical example an aggressive marketing in the format war is selling a software at a low price but a relatively high price for support service.

One of the advantages is that it helps a company jump -stand demand among competitions

You might be interested in
In photography where ur light source comes from makes a big difference because it will invariably create certain effects on ur s
Elza [17]

Answer:

Yes, when doing photography you want to make sure the light is in a certain place. The light can effect everything. You also want to make sure that the light shining on the camera, but somewhere on the thing u are taking a photo of.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is a brass instrument. a flute b french horn c piccolo. d English horn
Stells [14]
I think it is the french horn
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1) true or false :
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

1) False

2) False

3) True

4) True

Explanation:

1) International trade did not begin in 18th century but it started in between 16th and 17th century when the barter system was shifting towards mercantilism. Therefore, answer is False.

2) Twentieth-century although marked duly rise in the female sports fans but marketing efforts were not primarily shifted towards them but included them among the male sports fan base. The female fans created a new segment of marketing which resulted in creating a new product line according to their tastes and preferences. Therefore, the answer is false.

3) Economic sanction does not take into consideration only the economic factors but also various other factors like trade barriers, restrictions on financial transactions, etc. Thus, this makes the economic sanctions more restrictive in nature than the trade sanctions. Therefore, the answer is true.

4) Less affluent countries generally focuses on minimizing the cost and not maximizing the profit in order to meet there requirements effectively. Thus, such countries mostly prefer to use ethnocentric orientation of management system and therefore prefer to operate locally as this would help them minimize the cost and reduce wastage. Therefore, the answer is true.

6 0
3 years ago
An electronics firm is currently manufacturing an item that has a variable cost of $0.50 per unit and a selling price of $1.00 p
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

Part (a) Should the firm buy the new equipment

The Firm Should not Buy the New Equipment since there is  No Profit ( instead $1000 Profit lost) from this decision and is in a worse off position than before.

Part (b) should the company buy the new equipment and increase the selling price?

The Firm Should Buy the New Equipment since an incremental Profit of $ 1500 is expected from this decision.

Explanation:

Part (a) Should the firm buy the new equipment

                                                 Do Not Buy      Buy New Equipment

                                                        $                                $

Sales                                             30,000                     50,000

Less Variable Cost                       15,000                      30,000

Contribution                                  15,000                      20,000

Less Fixed Costs                          14,000                      20,000

Net Income                                     1,000                           0

The Firm Should not Buy the New Equipment since there is  No Profit ( instead $1000 Profit lost) from this decision and is in a worse off position than before.

Part (b) should the company buy the new equipment and increase the selling price?

                                                 Do Not Buy      Buy New Equipment

                                                        $                                $

Sales                                             30,000                     49,500

Less Variable Cost                       15,000                      27,000

Contribution                                  15,000                     22,500

Less Fixed Costs                          14,000                      20,000

Net Income                                     1,000                        2,500

The Firm Should Buy the New Equipment since an incremental Profit of $ 1500 is expected from this decision.

5 0
3 years ago
A landowner owned a large piece of property containing an inn and a bakery. She entered into a contract to sell the property to
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.

Explanation:

When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.

The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.

Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.

Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On December 18, 2017, Stephanie Corporation acquired 100 percent of a Swiss company for 4.0 million Swiss francs (CHF), which is
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose you are a T-shirt producer in a market without price controls. You are charging a price that is below the equilibrium pr
    8·2 answers
  • Analyzing portfolio risk and return involve the understanding of expected returns from a portfolio. Consider the following case:
    15·1 answer
  • Keynesian economics focuses on explaining why recessions and depressions occur, as well as offering a ______________________ for
    11·1 answer
  • _____ in downtown Washington, DC, is home to the headquarters of many lobbying firms and interest groups and is synonymous with
    11·1 answer
  • George received an e-mail that threatened to release his personal financial data unless he paid a fee. That situation is an exam
    11·2 answers
  • what is the effective interest rate of a simple discount note of 8000 at an ordinary bank discount rate of 11%, for 120 days?
    10·1 answer
  • The part of the market that a specific product is focusing on is called a____.
    15·2 answers
  • T or F #7 QUICK
    6·1 answer
  • Which skills do business leaders rate as the most important for college graduates to possess?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!