Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on the information it can be said that in this scenario either party can appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court if a federal question is involved. This means that there is an issue within the case that involves the constitution or other federal laws. These types of issues are cause for being able to take the case to the Supreme court.
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Think of the football cleats on the field. They have better grip which is why they don't slip as often as someone on a basketball court would.
Answer:
A. Coercive
Explanation:
Stephanie, the manager seems to be demanding respect from her subordinates in a forceful way.
To coerce means to persuade an unwilling person to do something by threats or force.
Stephanie is frustrated because her method of coercion has failed to work on her subordinates so she has gone to report to a higher authority.
Answer: 1. Decreasing
2. Increasing
Explanation: i guess on it my guy
