No, it does not seem reasonable. The quarterly statement reports an increase of $47, so it would be a positive rate of return on the investment instead of a negative rate.
Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
3y = 2x
Divide each side by 3
3y/3 = 2x/3
y = 2/3 x
The direct variation relationship is
y = kx
In this case k = 2/3
Answer:
idk sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
