This is a issue of morality and ethics. So the answer to the first question depends on the perspective of the person. Personally I don't agree with performance enhancing drug use but I do think some of the expectations of athletes who perform in Olympic events increase the pressure to have to use them. So do I think people who use these drugs should be elected into the Hall of Fame. That is hard to answer. But I do not think using drugs takes away all of the achievement an athlete has made. It just proves that the athlete couldn't achieve the rigid sport performance without manipulation. But it doesn't mean they haven't worked hard or trained.
I do think rules should be made for athletes. These rules would definitely weave through most of the athletes we see doing these out of the world sport records every day. That is because many of them have been proven to have used these performance enhancing drugs.
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
<span>D. Congress forced him to retract his idea.
Whereas,
</span><span>Andrew Johnson continued with Lincoln's plan after he became President.</span>
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
they do sense their environment in other ways and respond accordingly. they can detect various wavelengths and use colors to tell them what the environment is like
Genes are segments of DNA used to produce proteins.
Genetics is the study of hereditary.
Hereditary is the passing of traits from parents to offspring.
DNA is the genetic material passed from parent to offspring.
I believe these are correct. Hope this helps :)
It spanned 4.059 billion years.
So it is none of the above.
