The thing that's wrong with the equation is that 2 shouldn't be multiplied by 4 but should have been added.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
From the information given, it can be seen that the equation is:
(3x²)(-2x⁴) = 3(-2)x² × x⁴ = 6x^8
Based on the information above, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation will be:
(3x²)(-2x⁴) = 3(-2)x² × x⁴
= -6x^6
Therefore, the multiplication should be an addition of the power.
Learn more about equations on:
brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. 2x + 5, with the restriction x ≠ five over 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression is the difference of squares, so factors as ...
the product of the quantity 2x plus 5 and the quantity 2x minus 5 over the quantity 2x minus 5
You will note that the numerator and denominator have a common factor:
the quantity 2x minus 5
Factoring that out gives ...
2x + 5, with the restriction x ≠ five over 2 (x is restricted from being a value that makes the denominator zero.)
_____
<em>Comment on the form of the answer</em>
Since you have written your math expressions using words instead of symbols, we assume you can read them more easily that way. So, we have provided the explanation in the form you can most easily understand. (Personally, I prefer math symbols. They are more compact and tend to be less ambiguous.)
The postulate of the corresponding angles establishes that when a transversal line cuts two parallel lines, the corresponding angles are congruent. These angles are on the same side of the parallel lines and on the same side of the transversal line.
Then, if we based on this definition and analize the figure attached, we can notice that the angles ∠1 and ∠3 are corresponding angles, so they are congruent. In this case the angle ∠1 is internal and the angle ∠3 is external.
The answer is: ∠1 and ∠3 are congruent (See the image attached).
Answer:
Her overtime rate would be $19.5.
Step-by-step explanation:
Half of 13 is 6.5. If you add that to the $13 she makes, it would be $19.5.
