Answer:
The required solution is (5.75,-0.5). It can be written as 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given equations are
.... (1)
.... (2)
Multiply the equation (2) by 2.
.... (3)
Subtract equation (1) from equation (3).
Put this value in equation (1).
Therefore the required solution is (5.75,-0.5). It can be written as .
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
i think it might be d
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
n*8=24
Step-by-step explanation:
3*8=24
Answer:
since p value < x(0.05) so we reject the null hypothesis
step 5 ( conclusion)
reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average percentage differs from 5.5.
Step-by-step explanation:
check the attachment for detailed explanation
