Answer:
The correct answer is <u>B</u>: to strengthen the economy of each region while ensuring that the federal government would remain strong.
Explanation:
The American System was an economic plan based on the financial ideas of Alexander Hamilton, supported by Henry Clay.
The plan had three mutually reinforced parts, based on a new national bank, taxing foreign goods and creating a subsidized infrastructure of new roads and canals. Therefore, this system tried to strengthen the American economy by protecting manufacturing with a protective tariff, the Second Bank of the United States provided a strong currency and by giving a bigger role to the federal government (e.g. with federally funded internal improvements as roads and canals).
New South<span>, </span>New South Democracy or New South Creed is a phrase that hasbeen used intermittently since the American Civil War to describe the AmericanSouth<span>, </span>after 1877.
The term<span> "</span>New South<span>" </span>is used in contrast to the Old South of the plantationsystem of the antebellum period.
The original use of the term<span> "</span>New South<span>" </span>was an attempt to describe anindustrial and less slave reliant South.
The industrial revolution of the North greatly influenced the<span> "</span>New South<span>." </span>Theantebellum South was largely agrarian and sought to preserve its culturalidentity in departing from the Union<span>, </span>which led to the irrepressible conflict.
Richard H. Edmonds of the Baltimore Manufacturers Record was anotherstaunch advocate of New South industrialization.
One way of envisioning the New South was the socialist Ruskin Colonies.
The historian Paul Gaston coined the specific term<span> "</span>New South Creed<span>" </span>todescribe the hollow promises of white elites like Grady that industrializationwould bring prosperity to the region<span>.</span>
<span>Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (2010). The 5-4 decision that ensued ruled against laws prohibiting unions and corporations from using their general treasury funds on political advertisements. The rationale behind this decision is that it was a fundamental violation of the First Amendment's right to free speech, which of course allows for the right for individuals to express their views, opinions, and support of various causes without fear of retribution from the government. The decision was highly controversial and has unquestionably increased both the scope and influence of superPACS and special interest groups.</span>
