1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
13

identify and explain one aspect of the scientific revolution that would support the interpretation that it was more important th

an either the renaissance or the reformation
History
1 answer:
lukranit [14]3 years ago
5 0
The aspect of the scientific revolution that would support the interpretation that it was more important than either the Renaissance or the reformation is that it brought advanced technology (medicine and navigation) better than reformation which caused religious wars (thirty years and roses war)
You might be interested in
What are the reason or Evidence that you’re against child labor? Plzzz help
Bas_tet [7]
Evidence would be that child labor laws were put in place since children would work long hours for little pay in very very rough conditions.
8 0
3 years ago
After Soviet postwar actions made it plain that it was trying to expand communist influence, President Harry Truman and his advi
ankoles [38]
Truman Doctrine is your answer to your question  <span />
5 0
3 years ago
Which fascist leader was known as Il Duce?
m_a_m_a [10]
It would be "b. Benito Mussolini" who was the fascist leader known as Il Duce, since this is Italian for "the Leader," and Mussolini had almost complete control of the Italian state. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What interest would a Catholic Cardinal have I’m settling a new land?
natima [27]
B religious converts!
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the pros and cons of globalization condensed?
Maurinko [17]
Pros of globalization:

-It can increase trading ,and the developing countries would have an greater access to market overseas,hence the more developed countries would be able to enjoy cheaper goods while the developing countries would be able to buy goods with higher quality.

-It promote cultural intermingling and countries would be able to learning more about other cultures, thus building up mutual respect to each other. This is likely to lower the possibility of discrimination and divergence between people. It would also promote initiatives to create new ideas and products.

Cons

-There would be a loss of cultural divergence,which is important to building one's cultural identity as well as self-identity.

-It could potentially widen the poverty gap. Large multinational corporations are likely to dominate the market thus threatening the opportunities for local corporations or smaller brands survival.

Hope it helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The founder of Islam was _____.
    5·2 answers
  • In what way did legal rights for women expand in Great Britain during the 19th century?
    9·2 answers
  • Choose a delegated power (national power) and explain why it would be difficult to have each of the 50 states exercise that powe
    5·1 answer
  • What allowed that land bridge over what is now the Bering strait to form?
    14·1 answer
  • What main problem did John Ross have with the treaties between the U.S. government and the Cherokee? A.) He felt the treaties we
    7·1 answer
  • What leader oversaw the greatest territorial expansion of the Mongol Empire?
    8·1 answer
  • the Russian graduate develop their own version of Christianity, calling it _____. Briefly, why did the Russians develop their ow
    12·1 answer
  • Which scientist was associated with a screw used for irrigation? Euclid Archimedes Plato Aristotle
    14·1 answer
  • Which newspaper headline best reflects the contribution of alvin york
    14·1 answer
  • In this excerpt, how does Haydn change the melody when phrase A repeats?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!