Answer: 16 units more than social optimum.
DWL = dead weight loss = (1/2)*(Q* - Q°) 12 =96
Explanation:
Q=1200 - 4P and Q=-240 + 2P
In a free market quantity demand =quantity supplied
1200 -4P = -240 +2P
P =240
Sub P
Q* = 240
Socially optimal quantity is
Marginal social benefit (MSC)= marginal social cost(MSC), including external damage =MEC
MPC= marginal private cost =inverse of supply function
MPC = (1/2)*Q + 120
MEC=12
MSC =(MPC +MEC) = (1/2)Q +120 +12
MSC= MPB where MPB is marginal private benefit = inverse of demand functn
MPB = 300 -(1/4)Q
(1/2)Q + 132 =300 - (1/4)Q
Q° = 224
Difference btw Q* & Q° = 16 units more than social optimum.
DWL = dead weight loss = (1/2)*(Q* - Q°) 12 =96
Answer:
option (c) $25 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The marginal propensity to consume in Frugalia, MPC = 0.60
Increase in spending = $10 million
Now,
The total increase in income
= 
× Increase in spending
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
× $10 million
= 
× $10 million
or
= 2.5 × $10 million
or
= $25 million
Hence,
The answer is option (c) $25 million
Answer:
e. all of the above
Explanation:
Just like inn games, all the features enumerated in the options apply.
Specifically, actions by players determine outcomes. Also, players employ strategies to obtain desired results.
Answer: "The rise in the price of a pair of running shoes will increase the supply of running shoes".
This statement is <u><em> false</em></u> because <em><u>a decrease in demand for running shoes does not increase the price of a pair of running shoes and an increase in the price of a pair of running shoes does not increase the supply of running shoes. </u></em>
This occurs as the price of a pair of running shoes increases,therefore decreasing the demand and thus the supply will not increase.
