Answer:
The correct answer is number "2": allow them to continue for a reasonable amount of time.
Explanation:
According to Alex Pentland and Benjamin Waber’s "<em>Productivity through coffee breaks</em>", employees who relate to each other the most are more productive because as they have a certain knowledge of each one of them, they could make better work-related decisions.
In that case, as Susanna believes in Alex Pentland and Benjamin Waber’s research, she is likely to allow Steven and Amy to keep talking in Amy's cubicle for a reasonable time.
I think the answer is <span>unit-elastic over this price range. This happens when a company earns the same revenue even with some slight changes on the prices. It means that slight increase or even decrease in price does not affect the revenue of the company.</span>
Answer:
Not to leave previous job.
Explanation:
- First of all, the question is that what he will lose after leaving the job?
- His earning per year is equal at both sides, still what's the opportunity cost for him?
<em>The answer is simple,</em> he may earn equal but if looked at it in a bigger picture he is losing 401k retirement plan and It is his opportunity cost. He may regret this after leaving the job.
Answer:
Unit cost= $5,5unit
Explanation:
Total manufacturing cost is the aggregate amount of cost incurred by a business to produce goods in a reporting period.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that the cost of goods sold shall consist of:
the cost of direct materials
the cost of direct labor
the cost of manufacturing overhead
Expenses that are outside of the manufacturing facilities, such as selling, general and administrative expenses, are not product costs. They are reported as expenses on the income statement in the accounting period in which they occur.
<u>In this exercise:</u>
Cost of goods manufactured:
Direct materials= $13700
Direct Labor=$4800
Factory overhead= 800hours*$25=$20000
Total= $38500
Unit cost= 38500/7000=$5,5unit
Answer:
The answer is: A) some people win, some people lose, and there is a loss of economic efficiency.
Explanation:
When the government imposes a price ceiling, some consumers win since they buy cheaper products (lower than equilibrium price) but suppliers lose. Inf the government decides a price floor is better, then customers will lose and some suppliers will win (prices are higher than equilibrium price).
Both price ceilings and price floors cause deadweight loss, decreasing economic efficiency.