Answer:
each person chooses one
Explanation:
each family for example will go on to choose one another
Answer:
By evaluating opposing arguments, scientific claims can be examined and strengthened.
Explanation:
The purpose of argument is to establish a better, more accurate conclusion. This is demonstrated in the given scenario: because there is disagreement, scientists work hard to find conclusive evidence towards one point or another.
Why not B: It doesn't really depend on conflicting data, though a bigger sample size and more groups helps to get a wider representation. You want your results to gradually converge.
Why not C: This is so untrue! Disagreement is key to healthy discussion and honing down scientific points.
Why not D: Two scientists can disagree; this doesn't flat-out disprove hypotheses. What it does is cast light on their discrepancy and lead them to improve their conclusions or do more research.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
They are examples of endocytosis because they all engulf or bring in substance into cell
Answer:
The answer to the first one is B. A mechanism for the evolution of a population to become better adapted to their environment over many generations.
The answer for the second one is C.vestigial
Explanation: