The answer is 8th Amendment
Answer:
Option C - Resources. Please let me know if it's correct or not
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.
Answer:
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, they can amend the unconscionable clause, but may not remove it completely.
I hope this helped at all.
Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).
Explanation: :)