1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
4 years ago
9

In general, "probable cause" means the facts of a given situation would convince a reasonable person that a crime has been, or i

s being, committed. What sorts of facts or circumstances might make up probable cause?
Law
1 answer:
lianna [129]4 years ago
8 0

Answer: a warrantless search or seizure

Explanation: A probable cause to seize or search property exists when facts and circumstances known to an officer would have lead to a reasonable person to believe that the item is contraband ( banned substance, items ), stolen, or constitutes evidence of a crime. When a search warrant is issued, only items described on the warrant can be searched for.

You might be interested in
Which amendment prohibits excessive bail
aliya0001 [1]
The answer is 8th Amendment
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Land is defined as all natural
algol [13]

Answer:

Option C - Resources. Please let me know if it's correct or not

3 0
4 years ago
In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte
Ratling [72]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.

8 0
3 years ago
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, it: None of these answers. Can remove the unconscionable clause but may not re
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, they can amend the unconscionable clause, but may not remove it completely.

I hope this helped at all.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5.) What is the current legal status of sentencing guidelines?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).

Explanation: :)

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If asked questions by an officer, you may not remain silent during a traffic<br> stop?
    13·1 answer
  • The term “corrections” was introduced to describe prisons in what decade?
    14·1 answer
  • I need help please and I will give u brainlist. At least give me 70+ words.
    6·2 answers
  • ⦁ How does the Fourteenth Amendment define a U.S. citizen?
    12·2 answers
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • Police officers are like any other employees in many ways. One important factor is our motivation level. What are the five motiv
    5·1 answer
  • What is commercial practice
    5·2 answers
  • Plea bargains typically do nothing to help manage the caseload and resources for the court. Question 10 options: True False
    6·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from The Secret Garden. The native servants she had been used to in India were not in the least like this. They
    13·1 answer
  • 2. Which leadership position in Congress has the most power?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!