1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marysya [2.9K]
3 years ago
10

-4(3+n)>-32 Please Solve just like the picture

Mathematics
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
7 0

n

The number line is shown in figure attached below.

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to solve the inequality -4(3+n)>-32 and find value of n.

Solving the inequality:

-4(3+n)>-32

Multiplying -4 with terms inside the bracket.

-12-4n>-32

Adding 12 on both sides:

-12-4n+12>-32+12

-4n>-20

Divide both sides by -4 and reverse the inequality:

n

The number line is shown in figure attached below.

The number line starts with 5 with unfilled hole because n is less than 5 and moves towards left of the number line, because all values less than 5 are included in number line.

Keywords: Solving inequalities

Learn more about Solving inequalities at:

  • brainly.com/question/1465430
  • brainly.com/question/6703816
  • brainly.com/question/4192226

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
Which of the following functions is graphed below?
dalvyx [7]
Hmmm I think either D or C
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I was at the store, and saw two sizes of avocados being sold. The regular size sold for $0.84 each. For what prices would the la
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes of the bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that two sizea of avocados are being sold, since the regular size is being sold for $0.84 each, let the price for the bigger avocado be $x.

Then note the following:

1. How bigger than the smaller avocado is the bigger one?

This would determine if the price for the bigger one is a bargain, or a mistake.

If for instance, the bigger avocado is double the size of the smaller one, then for any price, $x less that $1.68 (twice of $0.84), it is a bargain.

The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Katie is playing a game using a 26-card deck that contains the black suits of the cards, which are 13 clubs and 13 spades. She c
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

The probability that Katie will draw a face card on her next turn is 3/13, or approximately 23%.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a regular deck, there are four suits (clubs, spades, hearts and diamonds).  Each suit has 13 cards that go from 2 - 10 plus the Ace, King, Queen and Jack.  Since Katie is playing using a 26-card deck of only two suits, then there are only two kings, two queens and two jacks in the entire deck.  In order to find probability, we form a fraction where the denominator is the total number of outcomes, in this case 26, and the numerator is the number of desired outcomes, in this case the total number of face cards in the deck - 6.  So, the probability that Katie will choose a face card on the next turn is 6/26, which simplifies to 3/13 in lowest terms.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dana is planning to drive 400 miles from
GaryK [48]

Answer:

A. 8 gallons

B. Drive by car is $59.4 cheaper than travel by train

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the scenario, given data are as follows,

Total drive = 400 miles

Total drive per gallon = 50 miles

Fuel cost per gallon = $4.45

A. So, Total fuel required to drive 400 miles can be calculated as follows,

Total fuel required =  Total drive ÷ Total drive per gallon

By putting value, we get,

Total fuel required = 400 ÷ 50

= 8 gallons

B. Total cost if drive by car = 8 gallons × $4.45 = $35.6

Cost if travel by train = $95

Hence it is clearly shows that drive by car is much cheaper than travel by train.

Cost saved by travel by car = $95 - $35.6 = $59.4

So, drive by car is $59.4 cheaper than travel by train.

5 0
3 years ago
In a study of the accuracy of fast food​ drive-through orders, one restaurant had orders that were not accurate among orders obs
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:Null hypothesis:  

Alternative hypothesis:  

 

 

The p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given  we have  so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of orders that were not accurate is not significant different from 0.1 or 10% .  

and the accuracy of the test yes is acceptable since the p value obtained is large enough to fail to reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation n  

n=367 represent the random sample taken

X=32 represent the orders that were not accurate

estimated proportion of orders that were not accurate

is the value that we want to test

represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

 

Alternative hypothesis:  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:  

(1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion  is significantly different from a hypothesized value .

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

 

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This methos is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

 

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given  we have  so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of orders that were not accurate is not significant different from 0.1 or 10% .  

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (2/3 * 2/3)(1/2 * 1/2) <br> (2/3 * 2/3)(1/2 * 1/2) in fraction form
    8·2 answers
  • Factor 2x2 − 24x + 72.
    6·1 answer
  • 45.701 in expanded form
    12·2 answers
  • A music club has 35 drum players. If 25% of the total number of members in the club are drum players, what is the total number o
    9·2 answers
  • Tickets for an amusement park cost $10 for adults and 6 for children find the total cost of 2 adults and 3 children
    7·2 answers
  • HelllllllP it’s due today :/
    15·1 answer
  • What's the simplified form of this expression? 3-[-2/3 x (7 +2) =11]
    15·1 answer
  • Jasmine can oil the lanes in a bowling alley in 10 hours. One day her friend joe helped her and it only took 4.44 hours. Find ho
    7·1 answer
  • Use the percent. proportion to solve 40% of what is 30?
    8·1 answer
  • how many even numbers less than 1000 can be formed from the given digits 0,2,3,5; if repetition is not allowed ?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!