It gave them things to trade with other countries and themselves in order to establish kingdoms
The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them.
<h3> Why does this often cause such a dramatic fight?</h3>
This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
<h3>Which body must approve the nomination for justices?</h3>
The president is known to be the person that has the power to nominate the justices and in terms of their appointments. they are known to be made with the advice and consent of the house of Senate.
Therefore, Since, The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them. This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
Learn more about Supreme Court justices from
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
Answer:
There are no limitations on “human rights” because they do not exist in the natural world. If there were such things as “natural rights” there would be no need to define and enforce them since, being part of the natural world, they would require no human intervention.
Explanation:
I searched your question on the internet and the first thing I saw was that^^
Answer:
In order to execute imperialism, it is very important to have the support of the people. The most efficient way to have and maintain the support of the people is to promote nationalism.
Explanation:
Nationalism is very different than patriotism. Patriotism can be define as the love of being from a country with respecting also the sovereignty of other nations. On the other hand, nationalism is an aggressive love for a country without considering the sovereignty of other nations. Nationalism is the key element to go to war. The leader of a nation can never go to war without practicing nationalism on his people as his political tool.