Adam Smith would most likely oppose a plan for government bailouts for failing corporations. *
Answer:
matching hypothesis
Explanation:
Matching hypothesis -
It is the theory , where the people with similar quality , behaviour or thinking tries to be together , in term of the social desirability , is known as matching hypothesis .
According to this theory , people tries to select their partner considering their taste to be as similar as possible , so they both can have same or similar thinking for life .
From this theory , people evaluate their own value and make some realistic choices by characterizing the best potential partner , to establish the similar level of attraction and comfort .
A. Body position and movement
Kinesthetic communication involves use of the body and its motion in order to communicate. Some examples might be a simple “thumbs up” or waving at your serving because you need a refill. The root of the word “kine” refers to the body and physical movement in many areas of study including medicine, education and psychology.
Given Information:
Mean = μ = 74
Standard deviation = σ = 8
Mary's score = x = 80
Bob’s score = z = +1.50
Sue’s score = above the mean by 10 points
Required Information:
If the students are placed in order from smallest score to largest score, what is the correct order?
Answer:
Mary = 80, Sue = 84, Bob = 86
Explanation:
Bob's score:
z = (x - μ)/σ
x - μ = zσ
x = zσ + μ
x = 1.50*8 + 74
x = 12 + 74
x = 86
Sue's score:
x = u + 10
x = 74 + 10
x = 84
Mary's score:
x = 80
From the smallest score to largest score
Mary = 80, Sue = 84, Bob = 86
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
