Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
It is true because friends, counselors, and parents can give you guidance and advise. Thus will help you when you are in trouble. This, releasing the stress.
Every time you go to the grocery store, you try to wait in the shortest line. but the lines always seem to be roughly the same length. Everyone else is trying to choose the shortest line, too.
Microeconomics studies the business behavior and decision-making of individuals, households, or firms. More specifically, this area of economics focuses on the interactions between those who buy products (consumers) and those who sell them (producers). They help describe general patterns of behavior.
High-income countries have built grocery stores as a living standard advantage for decades, so even with high growth rates, low-income countries can struggle to catch up.
Learn more about grocery stores at
brainly.com/question/23103804
#SPJ4
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.
<h2>Answer:-) ✿ ✿ ✿ ✿</h2>
<h2>Civil courts (not to be confused with the civil-law legal system) </h2><h2>deal with “private” controversies, particularly disputes that arise between individuals or between private businesses or institutions </h2><h2>Explanation :-) </h2>
<h2>keep smiling ☺️ ♡</h2>
<h2>Sorry !! ☹️</h2>
<h2>follow back plzz </h2>
