Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The overjustification effect is a term in psychology that is described as an act when used diminishes intrinsic motivation; this effect takes place when a reward (introduction of an extrinsic reward ) is been attached as a motivator of behavior, as a result, decreases the intrinsic motivation (behavior that is driven by internal rewards) to do something. Incentive such as money, gift, praise etc are introduced after a behavior can lead to lower, rather than higher motivation to perform a task
According to the overjustification effect, reinforcements that praise people tend to increase intrinsic motivation, and reinforcement that seeks to control people decrease intrinsic motivation.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (A) "Commitment".
Explanation:
According to Marcia's theory of identity, an adolescent faces two different phases to known her or his identity: "crisis" and "commitment". In this example Megan has overcome the crisis phase because she realized that she wants to become a pop star. Now Megan is in in the commitment phase, where she works to achieve her dream of being a pop star by taking piano and vocal-training classes.
Answer:
2x = 67 2x + 1 = 67 2x + 2 = 67 x2 + 1= 67.
Explanation:
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
