Philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) serves as philanthropic approach to CSR in which organizations target programs that will generate the most positive publicity.
<h3>What is Philanthropic corporate social responsibility?</h3>
Philanthropic corporate social responsibility can be regarded as one whereby, there us donation funds, goods to another organization or cause.
They runs the greatest risk of being perceived as self-serving behavior.
Learn more about Philanthropic corporate social responsibility at:
brainly.com/question/13171394
Answer:
"Problem recognition" is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- An empirical investigation has said that the initial phase of the development procedure of the customer and therefore its approach to buying seems to be the acknowledgment of problems that arise when consumers realize that perhaps the problem would also have to be solved.
- This is whenever the customer sees a requirement and is driven to rectify the conflicts.
Answer:
e. $104,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the ending capital balance is shown below:
As we know that
Ending capital balance = Opening capital balance + net income - withdrawn amount
where,
Opening capital balance = $64,000
Net income is
= Revenues - expenses
= $100,000 - $48,000
= $52,000
And, the withdrawn amount is $12,000
So, the ending capital balance i s
= $64,000 + $52,000 - $12,000
= $104,000
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
