Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
<span>When a group of people feel they have been treated unfairly by the government, the US Constitution guarantees you the right to redress the government. I would say this sentence captures the main idea which is what the Japanese Americans did including especially Mary Tsukamoto was succeed in getting redress for their wrongful internment in WWII by the passing of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. </span>
Answer:
Power can corrupt when someone is looking for power and when they start liking it, so they will go out and try to think they are better than other people.
Explanation:
The balance of power between the characters changed because when the man was stuck in the well the children thought they had more power over the man in the beginning of the story, but at the end of the story, the man in the well gained more power over over the children when he was making them scared because he knew their names which frightened them.
A.) herman melville.................... sorry it needed 20 characters
