Answer: Unconditioned Stimulus
B) Conditioned Stimulus
Explanation:
In Classical conditioning, learning occurs when a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus which can bring about conditioned responses.
For example, unconditioned stimulus (food) is presented repeatedly just after the presentation of the neutral stimulus (bell). After conditioning, the neutral stimulus alone produces a conditioned response (salivation), thereby becoming a conditioned stimulus. From this example, if a dog salivates whenever it sees food but a bell is rung before the food is presented, Overtime just ringing the bell will make the dog to salivate.
The answer is C.) the capitalist economy is controlled by the state for the benefit of the poor
Answer:
Varias variables demográficas juegan un papel central en el estudio de las poblaciones humanas, especialmente la fertilidad y fecundidad, la mortalidad y esperanza de vida y la migración. ...
Explanation:
Answer:
d. the person
Explanation:
The real psychological, and then societal and cultural, implication of one's death is the leave of the person and the vacancy they leave in the society's structure.
<u>Each person has it's own place in the structure of the family, neighborhood, job, etc. and with death, the rest must learn how to cope with their leave and continue without implications.</u>
It is also notable that the body in most of the cultures is just the symbol of the person, while the real person is connected to their social role, identity and behavior, which they fulfill and have while alive. This is why in many cultures the death of the brain is taken as the "real" and legal death - <u>only the leave of the person's identity, social role and function is really what the environment misses with one's death.</u>
The following phrase most adequately describes the rule of law:
the definition of authority
Explanation:
The rule of law despite how it sounds does not mean to set of Order and rules that the law follows.
In fact, the statement is quite different and its stress is on a completely different set of things.
it is more of a guarantee of the law and its preceding ever other matter in terms of the rule over the country.
It is a phrase that in a sense states that the law has an authority over the people that cannot be compromised or tinkered with .
It is an affirmation of the rule of the law over its subjects.
