Answer:
-When a plaintiff attempts to gain "home-court advantage" by fling his lawsuit in a courthouse close to his place of business
Explanation:
Forum shopping is the act of filling a lawsuit in a courthouse in which the plaintiff believes is likely to provide the most favorable outcome.
Forum shopping is a practice that occurs when filling a lawsuit, therefore a defendant is not able to practice forum shopping.
It is fair to assume that a plaintiff's place of business is likely to provide him the most favorable outcome.
Answer:
ewtdesv fdwihw glispañolby trdesdy //=25×9trasi noder
Answer:
Bad, mainly because the governmental officials could accept bribes from people to change things, or take their favor in a case, or even bribe the president to pardon them from prison! Thus making the streets more dangerous with all these bad people around.
Also with the government being corrupt, the president could also appoint corrupted judges, so therefore having court cases be unwell.
Taxes could rise without good reason.
Roads and other things wont get fixed.
Government could hoard money, and the economy can fall.
Hope this helped
Answer:
The condition that is NOT a known consequence of electrolyte imbalance is d. Development of lanugo.
Explanation:
<u>People who have eating disorders commonly develop lanugo, a fine, light hair on the chest, arms, back, and face. Lanugo is a reaction to fat depletion - being too thin -, an attempt by the body to maintain its temperature. Lanugo is </u><u>not</u><u> a consequence, therefore, of electrolyte imbalance.</u> The most common potentially fatal consequence of electrolyte imbalance is cardiac arrhythmia, and possibly heart failure.
Answer:
<em><u>Similarities and difference between the indigenous people of Australia and New Zealand</u></em>
There exist only a few similarities between the Aborigines of Australia and the Maori of New Zealand. Both of these groups were first on their respective lands and both their lands were taken over by the Europeans a few hundred years ago. They both suffered from extreme poverty due to the west and the Europeans' financial status was always better than theirs.
Looking at it from a cultural point of view, The Maori and the Aboriginals come from two completely unrelated backgrounds. Also, while the Aborigines had inhabited their native Australia for thousands and thousands of years before they were conquered by the Europeans, the Maori had lived in their lands for only about 800 years. There were always fights and conflicts between the British and the Maori while the Aborigines were treated far worse by the British, depriving them of all their basic rights.
