Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
It was written on December 16, 1689 by William III and Mary II.
This is what you’re looking for I think. Hope this helped.
British began to show interest in the American colonies because of its economic benefits. British established colonies in America so that they could profit economically through trade and raw materials. The British needed raw materials for their factories. The British colonies in America expected to provide cotton, fur, timber, etc.
Hope this helps you!
