Answer: To a very large extent
Explanation:
Encoding is the process by which a sender of a message conveys his/her thoughts into words. The encoder is the sender in a communication chain. For communication to be effective, the sender encodes a message based on what he/she believes about the receivers knowledge and assumptions, along with what additional information he/she wants the receiver to have.
Decoding is how a receiver understands a message, interprets it and acts on them. A decoder is the receiver in the communication process. The extent to which a receiver understands the intended message is a composition of many factors which includes, the receiver's education, experience, perception and also the level of relationship that subsist between the sender and the receiver
Effective communication is an important element in a business success, it enhances relationship between the business and its clients while also fostering a healthy work environment between staff.
For effective communication to be achieved, the sender has to use a medium that conveys the message in the best way possible. The importance of effective communication to our every day dealings can not be overemphasized, because communication is in the foundation of our very existence.
Answer: Risk mitigation
Explanation: In simple words, risk mitigation refers to the strategy in which the management of an organisation tries to reduce the threat that may occur to the business in future by taking suitable risk in present.
Usually the threats it reduces related to the problems affecting the continuity of the business.
In the given case, The manager of the company is employing highly qualified personnel instead of less qualified to manage procurement risk. Hence he is taking actions to reduce risk that may arise in future. Thus, the correct option is B.
Answer: D. Car
Explanation:
The full options for this question includes a fourth option which is option D for Car.
Should this be the case then a car would present the largest income effect if there was a price change.
Goods that are more expensive will present larger income effects because a price change would affect their prices more and make them even more expensive which means that they would be taking more from income and in so doing causing a larger income effect.
(if there is no fourth option for car, use tablet computer instead).
Answer:
d) $25,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of her remaining shares of $500.
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the tax consequences to Pam as a result of the stock redemption
Using this formula
Capital gain = Total amount - Tax basis
Let plug in the morning
Capital gain = (50 * $1,000) - ($500 * 50)
Capital gain = $50,000 - $25,000
Capital gain = $25,000
Since the Capital gain is $25,000 which means that The tax basis will be income tax basis in each share of $500 for the remaining 50 shares.
Therefore the the tax consequences to Pam as a result of the stock redemption will be:$25,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of her remaining shares of $500.
a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
b. The top-down approach can only be applied to specific business functions.
c. The top-down approach leaves other employees uncertain about their roles in the company.
d. The top-down approach is expensive to maintain, leaving the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Answer:
a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
Explanation:
The top-down approach is a model in which there is a hierarchical style and the decisions are made by the manager and then informed down the organizational chart and the lower levels have to accept the decisions. In this approach, people in the lower levels have low participation and influence on the decisions and as the firm's industry is changing too much, this people would posses crucial information and specialized knowledge that the top level might not have and because of that, this approach might not be effective. According to that, the answer is that this scenario is wrong because the self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.