1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
4 years ago
5

The distribution of weights for newborn babies is approximately normally distributed with a mean of 7.4 pounds and a standard de

viation of 0.7 pounds. 1. What percent of newborn babies weigh more than 8.1 pounds? % 2. The middle 95% of newborn babies weigh between and pounds. 3. What percent of newborn babies weigh less than 6 pounds? % 4. Approximately 50% of newborn babies weigh more than pounds. 5. What percent of newborn babies weigh between 6.7 and 9.5 pounds? %
Mathematics
1 answer:
blsea [12.9K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. 15.87%

2.  6 pounds and 8.8 pounds.

3. 2.28%

4. 50% of newborn babies weigh more than 7.4 pounds.

5. 84%

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following information in the question:

Mean, μ = 7.4 pounds

Standard Deviation, σ = 0.7 pounds

We are given that the distribution of weights for newborn babies is a bell shaped distribution that is a normal distribution.

Formula:

z_{score} = \displaystyle\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}

1.Percent of newborn babies weigh more than 8.1 pounds

P(x > 8.1)

P( x > 8.1) = P( z > \displaystyle\frac{8.1 - 7.4}{0.7}) = P(z > 1)

= 1 - P(z \leq 1)

Calculation the value from standard normal z table, we have,  

P(x > 8.1) = 1 - 0.8413 = 0.1587 = 15.87\%

15.87% of newborn babies weigh more than 8.1 pounds.

2.The middle 95% of newborn babies weight

Empirical Formula:

  • Almost all the data lies within three standard deviation from the mean for a normally distributed data.
  • About 68% of data lies within one standard deviation from the mean.
  • About 95% of data lies within two standard deviations of the mean.
  • About 99.7% of data lies within three standard deviation of the mean.

Thus, from empirical formula 95% of newborn babies will lie between

\mu-2\sigma= 7.4-2(0.7) = 6\\\mu+2\sigma= 7.4+2(0.7)=8.8

95% of newborn babies will lie between 6 pounds and 8.8 pounds.

3. Percent of newborn babies weigh less than 6 pounds

P(x < 6)

P( x < 6) = P( z > \displaystyle\frac{6 - 7.4}{0.7}) = P(z < -2)

Calculation the value from standard normal z table, we have,  

P(x < 6) =0.0228 = 2.28\%

2.28% of newborn babies weigh less than 6 pounds.

4. 50% of newborn babies weigh more than pounds.

The normal distribution is symmetrical about mean. That is the mean value divide the data in exactly two parts.

Thus, approximately 50% of newborn babies weigh more than 7.4 pounds.

5. Percent of newborn babies weigh between 6.7 and 9.5 pounds

P(6.7 \leq x \leq 9.5)\\\\ = P(\displaystyle\frac{6.7 - 7.4}{0.7} \leq z \leq \displaystyle\frac{9.5-7.4}{0.7})\\\\ = P(-1 \leq z \leq 3)\\\\= P(z \leq 3) - P(z < -1)\\= 0.9987 -0.1587= 0.84 = 84\%

84% of newborn babies weigh between 6.7 and 9.5 pounds.

You might be interested in
An object falls d meters in t seconds
harina [27]
You would take d times t seconds and find the answer
3 0
3 years ago
Solve this question
aleksklad [387]
The answer will be C 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the equation 4x=8.<br> Which value could be substituted x to make the equation TRUE?
const2013 [10]
X=2 (4 x 2 = 8) so 2 is the answer
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain, in complete sentences, which method you would use to solve the following system of equations and why you chose that met
svp [43]
I would use elimination. I would multiply 4x+3y=2 by 3 so the it becomes 12x+9y=6, and I would multiply the bottom equation by 4 so that it becomes 12x+8y=4. Because I am using elimination I have to get rid of one variable, I chose to get rid of X hence that the coefficient of X in each equation is now 12. i simply subtract both equations and get y by itself. y=2. I plug in Y to find x in either of the original equations, where I get x=-1. To check my work substitute the values of x and y in the other equation. 4(-1)+3(2)=2 ------->  2=2
4 0
3 years ago
What are 3 different ways to make the number 15,638 with only hundreds,tens,ones
Serhud [2]

Different ways to make the number 15,638 with hundreds, tens and ones are: <span>
156 hundreds, 3 tens and 8 ones
150 hundreds, 63 tens and 8 ones
141 hundreds, 161 tens and 28 ones
<span>we can write the numbers in thousands, hundreds, tens and ones by using the place values. We use these ten numbers 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 along with the concept of place value.</span></span>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (8-(-9))^2 + ((-3)-(-6))^2
    10·2 answers
  • AB || DE<br><br> Find: <br> m∠A = m∠<br> by reason <br> m∠ACB = m∠<br> by reason
    11·2 answers
  • If ST bisects RSV, m RST =5x-3 and m VST=2x+15 then choose an equation that could be used to solve for x
    14·1 answer
  • Lisa Lilly was the best runner in eighth grade. One day she ran 100m in 40 sec, 200m in 1 and 10 sec, and 200m over low hurdles
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASEEE HELP :)))
    12·1 answer
  • Find the length of arc QS
    12·1 answer
  • Caleb bought groceries and paid $1.60 in sales tax. The sales tax rate is 2.590.
    9·1 answer
  • Which equation is equivalent to (1/3)^x=27^x+2?
    12·1 answer
  • 938 divided by 7, pls give the solution too​
    7·2 answers
  • A) Complete the histogram.<br> b) Work out the total number<br> of members of the club.<br> members
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!