All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is an example of how Western imperialism led to regional conflicts?

History

2 answers:

Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is B) boundaries in Africa were drawn without regard to areas of ethnic groups.

An example of how Western Imperialist led to regional conflicts was that boundaries in Africa were drawn without regard to areas of ethnic groups.

When Western imperialist countries divided the continent of Africa, they did so without taking into consideration the history, traditions, culture, and Ethnicity of the tribes that already were settled there for years. European countries split Africa in an arbitrary form and established borders in the colonial times that did not respect and represented their heritage, creating a big ethnicity problem that still exists nowadays.

motikmotik3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

b ethic groups

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What are 10 current events that happened this year

Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

Now I'm not sure what you specifically need here, but I'll do my best.

Missiles Launched from Both North and South Korea

Resistance Group Stand Up to Taliban

Womens Rights Challenged in Afghanistan

New Government Announced in Lebanon

Apparent Coup in Guinea

The Taliban Continue to Advance

Bombing in Somalia

Terrorist Attack in New Zealand

Afghanistan on the Verge of Economic Collapse

Coronavirus Updates

I hope this is what you were looking for!

Explanation:

There are events that have happened recently all over the world.

3 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP, LAST QUESTION! 30 POINTS

kirza4 [7]

The raids were the first in what would become a three-year program of sustained bombing targeting sites north of the seventeenth parallel.The troops were the first in what would become a three-year escalation of U.S. military personnel fighting a counterinsurgency below the seventeenth parallel. Together, they Americanized a war the Vietnamese had been fighting for a generation

( This isn’t my answer all credit to taylormccord!!!! just wanted to help this person)

3 0

3 years ago

James Mill divided Indian History into the

iragen [17]

True— Because he did divide history into periods

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help please? The list above best describes the effects of...?

Artemon [7]

The Dust Bowl Days is your answer

The Dust Bowl was a period in history known for the destruction of the plain lands (Central USA and westward), which led to large amounts of people to go to California in hopes of starting a new life.

8 0

3 years ago

In a brief to the Supreme Court of Oregon, you cite the 1985 Supreme Court of Washington case Larry Daugert, Trustee for David M

dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Regarding the case of Daugert vs. Pappas; the Supreme Court must be informed that John Pappas and his firm were found guilty of malpractice, due to extra temporal request to review an appeal, on a case that was previously ruled in favor of his former client. His negligence conducted to his former client to assume costs, previously overruled by the Court. Main considerations for this case evaluation were the chances of the appeal reversion, as estimated by the Jury

Explanation:

Background

The attorney John Pappas was working for Mountain Development Company (MDC). Black Mountain Ranch (BMR), a commercial entity, bought a recreation complex from MDC. Several deficiencies appeared in the construction and both parties tried to resolved who should be in charge of repairing costs, without agreement.

As a solution, both proposed an agreement, with an external advisor evaluating the situation (Anvil Corporation). When Anvil concluded its investigation, indicated that all defects were caused by a faulty design made by MDC. MDC then rejected those findings, and also, refused to pay for the corrections. To this, BMR responded with a lawsuit against MDC, indicating an agreement breach.

At the end of trial, the Court assigned the blame not to MDC, but BMR, pointing that lack of maintenance resulted in degradation of the infrastructure. BMR then filed an appeal, indicating that, since there was no wrong intention proved, the agreement was biding.

MDC asked its attorney, John Pappas, to request a review to the Court; but this request was presented a day after finishing the valid period to receive the request. Considering this, the developer lost any chance of defending themselves against the appeal, and the Court failed in favor of BMR.

Summarizing, the lawsuit that initially was provided by Court in favor of MCD, was later lost because their attorney did not requested a review, in the given time.

As consequence, MCD, represented by Larry Daugert, presented a suit against Pappas, alleging malpractice.

Daugert vs. Pappas.

Pappas and his firm were accused by Daugert of breach of duty, causing MDC to lost a case that was ruled in their favor, due to an extra temporal appeal review request.

During trial, allegations were made based on the chances of dismissal of the appeal if the review request would have been accepted. Judge considered this an issue to be ruled by Jury, indicating them that:

There could be a chance that the malpractice from Pappas affected the final outcome against MDC.
The chance of the Supreme Court to accept the review and reversed the appeal outcome.
The percentage of avoiding damage lost by MDC due to Pappas malpractice.

Finally, the Jury calculated in 20% the changes of the Supreme Court to review and reverse the appeal, meaning that Daugert was able to prove malpractice performed by Pappas.

Main elements resulting of this trial

The main element used to rule malpractice is how close are the actions of the professional to create a negative result for its customer (proximity cause). On this case, the attorney failed to present a review in time, affecting his customer. This is the main justification provided to fail against Pappas, and used to define malpractice.

Also, considering that requesting the Jury to provide probabilities of the scenarios indicated by the Judge could have been considered out of rule, this was made in base of the client’s needs, and the legal profession. This, in order to provide a perspective of this proximity cause, for the Jury.

4 0

3 years ago