Answer:
How and when did the United States begin to extend its influence in Latin America? investing heavily in Latin America, soon replacing Europe as a source of loans and investments. What was the impact of U.S. involvement in Panama? States was granted a strip of land, where it built the Panama Canal.
Explanation:
Latin America–United States relations are relations between the United States of America and the countries of Latin America. Historically speaking, bilateral relations between the United States and the various countries of Latin America have been multifaceted and complex, at times defined by strong regional cooperation and at others filled with economic and political tension and rivalry. Although relations between the U.S. government and most of Latin America were limited prior to the late 1800s, for most of the past century, the United States has unofficially regarded parts of Latin America as within its sphere of influence, and for much of the Cold War (1947–1991), actively vied with the Soviet Union for influence in the Western Hemisphere.
The correct answer to the question stated above is letter B. college students
There are thousands of Vietnam War protestors. The college students made up a large percentage of these protestors.
>The Vietnam War was a watershed in American history exposing and creating cracks in the social structure<span>. </span>
Answer:
A)The wealthy are best suited to help the less fortunate.
Explanation:
The essay "Gospel of Wealth" by Andrew Carnegie stresses or emphasizes the philosophy or idea of social Darwinism that God made some people rich to help out those who are poor. In his essay, he touched on the issue of the rich and poor divide and how the former can bring equality to everyone.
Carnegie believes and proposed that philanthropic work makes everyone's life easier and lessens the rich-poor divide. One aspect of his essay that is based on social Darwinism is his belief that the wealthy are best suited to help the poor or the less fortunate.
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
<span>I am totally sure that this one D.social contract between person and ruler for security </span><span>wasn't one of Thomas Hobbes' philosophical views.</span>
Answer:
Sparta was not quite the same as Athens in pretty much every manner, starting with its government. While Athens was a majority rule system, Sparta was a theocracy. In a government, the decision power is in the possession of a couple of individuals. Sparta's administration-just as Spartan culture-was committed to military strength. One of the primary ways they were comparative was in their type of government. Both Athens and Sparta had to get together, whose individuals were chosen by the people. Sparta was managed by two lords, who controlled until they passed on or were constrained out of office. Athens was controlled by archons, who were chosen yearly.
Explanation:
hope this helps
