Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
I believe the answer is: <span>less accepting of the idea that humans are rational animals
He believes that human are animals that completely have to restraint themselves from irrational/animalistic instinct.
He doesn't buy the notion that humans are inherently good like what being preached by religious establishments, which make him regarded as the enemy of the church at that time</span>
Answer:
Concerns of safety
Explanation:
This makes the most sense in my opinion.
Hayek believed the economy too complicated to think in terms of aggregates. This is the foundation of monetarism theory. He believed that people are unpredictable in their choices. Consequently, expansionary policy was potent because it could potentially lead to inflation and affect individual choices.
Answer:
Explanation:
The most logical explanation for Mr Blum pointing out the errors in the current report is to have them corrected.
He is NOT worried about the functionality of your team. because he has complimented you on your past analyses in previous reports. The only issue Mr Blum seems to have is with the current report.
There is also no information here to indicate that Mr Blum thinks that you are ready for a promotion.
