When the primary caregiver is inconsistent and has personal problems that impede her or his ability to be a good parent, a child is likely to end up with an <u>anxious-ambivalent </u>attachment style.
Early childhood is when anxious attachment, also known as ambivalent attachment in children, develops. Most frequently, poor and inconsistent parenting is to blame for nervous attachment. Common symptoms of this attachment type include low self-esteem, intense fear of rejection or abandonment, and clinginess in relationships.
A child with an ambivalent attachment style could "up-regulate" their behavior in an effort to maintain their closeness to their parent. When a child is removed from their caretaker, this could result in them acting upset, irate, and even throwing a temper tantrum.
To learn more about anxious-ambivalent attachment style, click
brainly.com/question/15012227
#SPJ4
The term is "Social problem-solving".
Social problem-solving may likewise be called 'problem solving in real life'.It is a fairly scholastic method for depicting the frameworks and procedures that we use to take care of the issues that we experience in our regular daily lives.
The word 'social' does not imply that it just applies to issues that we tackle with other individuals, or, those that we feel are caused by others. The word is basically used to demonstrate the 'real life' nature of the issues, and the way that we approach them.
Answer:
Criminal
Explanation:
Hello! Criminal law is responsible for establishing and regulating the punishment of crimes, through the imposition of certain penalties that the State reserves for those who violate the rules of coexistence or conduct. The State has two tools to react against crime: security measures (which seek prevention) and penalties (which involve punishment).
The case should be on the venue where Austin bought the infected formula manufactured by Nestle USA Inc.
It doesn't affect if the baby was born in South Carolina: They cant say the alleged harm occur there just because the baby was born there. The harm occurred where Austin bought the formula by Nestle, if the formula was bought in Minnesota, South Carolina shouldn't be involved in this case just because Austin's residency.
The case shouldn't be transferred, the final verdict it should be determined by the laws of the state where the harm object (In this case the formula) was bought and consumed.
