1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sdas [7]
3 years ago
14

According to Lenin, why should the people be unhappy with the provisional government? Check any that apply

History
2 answers:
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
8 0

According to Lenin, <u><em>"Russia was still at war, land was still in hands of wealthy landowners instead of the people, and food shortages were still common, and people were hungry. Is correct answer. "Hope this helps! Thanks!"</em></u>

Charlie

Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago
7 0
What are the options 
You might be interested in
People with Japanese ancestors who were born in the United States were citizens, and during the WWII era were known as:
Feliz [49]
Pretty sure it's Nisei.
8 0
3 years ago
How does the quote reflect Roosevelt’s goal of giving Americans a square deal? Roosevelt wants to eliminate trusts in order to s
Rudiy27

Answer:It’s b

Explanation:

Roosevelt will handle trusts in ways that serve the public good

4 0
3 years ago
3. A bill has been sent to you by Congress that involves making flag burning
Mariana [72]
It is unconstitutional
3 0
3 years ago
For what reasons would you support forbidding disloyal language about the military during wartime? For the reasons would you obj
d1i1m1o1n [39]
One of the main reasons for this is in order to stop losing support for the war effort. As was seen in the espionage act and the sedition act, talking disloyally about the war effort was seen as treason and people would be punished for such things. This was because the government did not want the people to sabotage the effort and to prevent others from supporting the war effort. 

You should object to such laws because they infringe on first amendment rights since they are limiting your freedom of speech. Thanks to supreme court action, such laws would not be passed today because they would be unconstitutional since people have the right to criticize their government in a democratic country.
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP! What is the answer to this problem? What is 2+2
Afina-wow [57]

the answer you are looking for is 4

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Hilter establish a totalitarian state in Germany?
    15·2 answers
  • How would you describe the Bible to a friend?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the antiwar movement especially strong at colleges
    10·1 answer
  • What was holocaust ? What type of government was in a effect in Germany at the time of Holocaust
    12·2 answers
  • What were some of the major points of disagreement during ratification of the constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • Who won the french and indian war?
    13·1 answer
  • What compass did Roosevelt want to change?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Muslim scholars help preserve learning from the ancient world
    11·2 answers
  • IM ONLY GIVE BRAINLYEST IF YOU ANSWER QUICKLY NOT IF YOU ANSWER THE NEXT DAY BECAUSE I NEED THE ANSWER NOW!
    6·1 answer
  • The rashidun calphatewon control of lands in
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!