Answer:
Please mark me brainliest and thank me and rate me
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Given that Power whose unit is Watt equates to one joule of work per second. It implies that Power is directly proportional to the work done and inversely proportional to the time to do the work.
Therefore, in this case, the right answer to the question is that it is TRUE that the power is inversely proportional with time
Answer:
Option (A) , (b) and (d) are correct option
Explanation:
According to Coulomb's law electric force between two charges is given by
From the relation we can say that force is directly proportional to magnitude of charges and inversely proportional to distance between them '
So if we increase the distance then force will decrease
Increase if any of the charge get larger
If force is attractive then both the charge will be of different sign and is force is repulsive then both the charges of same sign
From above conclusion we can say that (a), (b) and (d) are correct option
Answer:
The correct option is;
The atoms and molecules of the liquid water are moving, while the atoms and molecules of the glass are not moving
Explanation:
Matter that exist in the liquid or gaseous state consist of molecules that move freely about in the entire containing medium for gas, while the molecules move freely in the portion of the container occupied by the fluid in the case of liquid fluids
However, the molecules of a solid are fixed within the current shape of the solid and are only free to vibrate within a fixed location and the allow the passage of subatomic particles such as electrons
As such, the glass cup being a solid, consists of molecules fixed in space, while the liquid water consists of molecules which can translate within the portion of the volume of the glass filled with the water.
Explanation:
The US Supreme Court has affirmed in Miller v. Johnson (1995) that racial gerrymandering is a violation of constitutional rights and upheld decisions against redistricting that is purposely devised based on race. However, the Supreme Court has struggled as to when partisan gerrymandering occurs (Vieth v.
