Answer:
Explanation: Both, like most of the world then and now, was developing an economic depression from hordes of excess labor undercutting wages and depleting resources. Overpopulation was not under control anywhere then and the world had overwhelmed the current technology's ability to access sufficient resources for the expanding hordes of people. So it was once again time for the most desperate to attack neighbors and take their land and resources. WW I had slaughtered some excess people but its stagnant trench warfare did almost nothing to acquire more useful land for anyone.
The people of Italy, Spain, and Germany became interested in Marxist international socialist and fascist national socialist policies in their growing desperation. Because the national socialists promised to protect national industries and its jobs against foreign competition undercutting them, they won the competition between the two radical socialist philosophies.
Italy's Mussolini developed the fascist "corporatist" national socialist structure. It was a more efficient shallow bureaucratic system that "incorporated" each industry under a single government bureau that controlled it.
Spain and Germany copied Italy's model. Italy's economy started improving and it began more conquests south into Africa and east into the Balkans to feed it. Spain became mired with a war against its Marxists who were raging jealous against the national socialist's popularity "stealing" their proletariat from them. Communists from other countries, including the US, entered Spain to help their communists. The German national socialists sided with Franco, Spain's fascist leader, and helped defeat the communists in a fierce civil war made famous by writers like Hemingway.
Germany was the most successful with the system. It was well suited to the traditional German culture's stricter discipline and socialist origins (according to Marx). Their economy improved most rapidly and the world was fascinated at it's initial success until it began its conquest for the land needed by it's expanding population. LIke Greece, Rome, and France before it, it decided to take so much as it could, not just what it needed for the immediate future. The rest is history you should already know.
I hope this helps :D
Imma look for these in my notes I might have the answer for this sure I’ll help you out
Ronald Reagan, who achieved the unity of the entire liberal American left, thought very little about the environment, in political terms, and did not fear that his popularity would be damaged by his decisions; so Reagan dismissed the problem of acid rain and the ideas to end it. During the 1980s, pollution was a major problem in Canada, and Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau blamed US factories for pollution, so the Environmental Protection Agency asked Reagan to commit more budget to reduce acid rain; but Reagan rejected it, saying it would waste government money, and even questioned all scientific evidence about the causes of acid rain.
Answer:
<h2>
Wanted to avoid another war.</h2>
Explanation:
Appeasement is a strategy based on the moral conviction of fear of war that leads to adaption of non retaliative and non-aggressive stance towards aggressors.
The most famous case of appeasement was the appeasement of Adolf Hitler by Prime Minister Chamberlain in the late 1930's. The appeasement was due to the trauma of the first world war as the countries witnesses death of vast number of young people, due to this Britain opposed another war due to any circumstances. That is why it allowed Hitler to expand German territory.
Answer:
O The judge delays court dates, so there is much expense in holding offenders in jail.
Explanation:
