Answer:
D. Both A and C
Explanation:
Items that are more useful and/or more rare, result in higher prices (and if both are true, even higher prices). If an item is rare but useless, the price would be lower. If an item is useful and not rare (think batteries or paper towels) the price lowers.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
we must first determine the assessed value not taxed on Garth's old home:
market value of Garth's old home - assessed value = $250,000 - $175,000 = $75,000
now we subtract $75,000 from the market value of Garth's new home:
$325,000 - $75,000 = $250,000 = adjusted assessed value of Garth's new home
The taxable value of Garth's new home (for city taxes) = adjusted assessed value - homestead exemptions (for city taxes) = $250,000 - $50,000 = $200,000
Answer:
B). Response bias
D). The interviewer should reword the question.
Explanation:
Response bias is described as the type of bias in which a variety of tendencies are displayed by the respondents to answer the questions asked in the survey inaccurately or misleadingly. These false responses eventually lead to a false or deceiving conclusion. In the given survey, 'response bias' is displayed as the respondents may display a tendency to answer the question falsely as the feeling of 'patriotism' evoked by the word 'patriotic' may prevent their original opinions to come out. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer to describe the bias in this survey.
In order to prevent this bias, the interviewer must 'reword the question' and remove the word 'patriotic' as it develops the feeling of patriotism in the respondents which mars them from answering accurately and share their true opinions or thoughts in the regards of 'supporting armed forces.' This rewording will help evoke the true and authentic responses without any bias. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer to remedy the bias.
<span>During the recent financial crisis, many financial managers and corporate officers have been criticized for (c) Large salaries. This criticism is certainly justified given that most executives received exorbitant compensation despite a plunge in the value of their companies. Thus, their salaries are not justifiable as they are not serving the needs of the shareholders whose interest they should serve. </span>
Answer:
I can't figure it out sorry
