Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
<span>Basically "Opportunity cost" is what you're going to lose (or have a potential to lose) if you chose a different action than what you're presented with. In the example, you're working for $15 an hour, but if you decide instead to skip a pratrice to go to the fair you're losing out of the $15 an hour you'll be paid and have to pay $9 to go to the fair. All total, you're opportunity costs for that will be $24 (fifteen you would have made plus the nine dollar fee.) This is also assuming, of course, they don't fire/dock you for just skipping work.</span>
Answer:
Balance of Stockholder's Equity at December 31 is $1,910,000.
Explanation:
This will appear as follows
Idaho Company
<u>Details $ </u>
Stockholder's Equity:
Common Stock 525,000
Preferred Stock 500,000
Additional Paid-In Cap. - Common Stock 625,000
Additional Paid-In Cap. - Preferred Stock 50,000
Treasury Stock (40,000
)
Retained Earnings <u> 250,000 </u>
Balance at December 31 <u> 1,910,000 </u>
Answer:
lack of anonymity
Explanation:
According to my research on whistle-blowing systems within organizations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the major issue that the program seems to have is a lack of anonymity. All whistle-blower systems are designed to be completely anonymous so that anyone who uses the system to do the right thing and report people who are breaking the law or rules are not mentioned and face backlash from co-workers. Apparently, the system that Company X is either not anonymous or is not adhering to the anonymity policy.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
