This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company.
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493.
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
Answer:
Down below
Explanation:
I deal with work in a serious way but not too n a serious so i can enjoy it,
Its cheers becuase you say the pep club cheer at every football game doesnt make sense if you the pep club cheers at every football game.
Dear John,
How are you doing, and how is the family? I read about your recent vacation and I felt that I should share my recent excursion with you.
I went to the zoo for my recent excursion. My father took me to the zoo, and I saw different animals. There were some animals that I hadn't seen before like the hyena, and the lion, so it was a good experience learning about the animals.
I also learned about the food that they eat and the number of years that they normally live for. I was glad that I learned about the animals.
I'll love to hear from you soon.
Your friend,
Henry.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/2459506
