Answer:
many buyers and sellers
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this situation violates the perfect competition assumption of many buyers and sellers. This is a model that many buyers and sellers in a competitive market agree on a single market price, and that no individual has influence over the price. Therefore if a single company, like Dell in this scenario, is able to influence the price then it is violating this assumption.
I think you’re referring to the competitive equilibrium price
Answer:
Present value of investment X = $41,225.37
Present value of investment Y = $37,233.50
Explanation:
The present value of the cash flows can be found by discounting the cash flows at the discount rate.
This can be found using a financial calculator
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 9 for investment X = $5,800
Discount rate = 5%
Present value = $41,225.37
Cash flow each year from year one to year 5 for investment Y = $8,600
Discount rate = 5%
Present value = $37,233.50
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: a). Spain
b). none
c). 2.4
Explanation: a). Absolute advantage occurs when a country produces more of a good than the other country. In this case, Spain produces 50 units of Tractors while, Bolivia produces only 30 units of Tractors. Thus, Since Spain is producing more it has an absolute advantage in Tractors.
b). Both the countries are producing equal units of Cotton. Thus, we can say that none of them has an absolute advantage in cotton production.
c. Opportunity cost is the cost of the lost alternative. When Spain produces Tractors it is sacrificing production of Cotton. So, opportunity cost on 1 unit of Tractor will be,

Thus, 2.4 units of cotton which is given up is the opportunity cost of Spain for producing 1 unit of Tractor.