1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
2 years ago
5

Fashion, Inc. had a Retained Earnings balance of $16,000 at December 31, 2021. The company had an average income of $6,500 over

the next 3 years, and an ending Retained Earnings balance of $15,000 at December 31, 2024. What was the total amount of dividends paid over the last three years
Business
1 answer:
avanturin [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Total amount of dividends paid over the last three years is $20500

Explanation:

The net income of the company is either retained in the company or paid out as dividends. To calculate the value of the ending retained earnings, we use the following formula,

Ending balance = Beginning balance + Net Income - Dividends

We first need to calculate the total net income for the 3 year period. The total net income for the 3 year period is, 3 * 6500 = $19500

Plugging in the available values for the ending and beginning balance of retained earnings and net income, we can calculate the value of total dividends paid for the three year period.

15000 = 16000 + 19500 - Dividends

Dividends = 35500 - 15000

Dividends = $20500

You might be interested in
HELPPPPPP!!!!
lidiya [134]

Answer:

B. Greater efficiency

Explanation:

Efficiency, in this case, will refer to achieving the desired results with minimal or no wastage. A distribution manager has the responsibility to ensure goods get to their destination as scheduled. The manager's efficiency will be gauged by the speed, accuracy, and safety of deliveries.

Other than cost savings, the distribution manager has to aim at achieving greater efficiency. Customer service and pricing are functions of other managers.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Asset A and B have expected returns of 5% and 3% per year respectively. Their annual volatilities are both 20% and the correlati
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

1. Weight of A=0.5, Weight of B= 0.5

2. Asset A has the highest shape ratio. The weight of A and B in the optimal risky portfolio that has the highest shape ratio is:

Weight of A= 0.105, Weight of B= 0.895

Explanation:

Expected return of Asset A= 5%Expected return of Asset A= 5%

Expected return of Asset B= 3%

Annual volatilities of Asset A= 20%

Annual votalities of Asset B= 20%

1. Correlation coefficient = 30% = 0.3 < 1

Risk Free Rate = 1% =0.01

1. Weight of A and B in portfolio with minimal risk is:

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Therefore,

CovXAXB = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2

= 0.012

Hence,

Weight of A= (0.2)^2 - 0.012 / (0.2)^2 + (0.2)^2 - 2(0.012)

Weight of A= 0.04 - 0.012 / 0.04 + 0.04 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.08 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.056

=0.5

Weight of A = 0.5

Weight of B= 1 - Weight of A

Weight of B= 1 - 0.5

Weight of B= 0.5

2. Shape ratio of A= RA - Rf / β

= 0.05 - 0.01 / 2

= 0.04/2

= 0.02 =20%

Shape ratio of B= RB - Rf / β

= 0.03 - 0.01/ 2

0.02 / 2

=0.01 = 10%

So, Asset A has the highest shape ratio

Cov (XAXB) = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.03 × 0.2 × 0.1

= 0.006

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Weight of A = (0.1)^2 - 0.006 / (0.2)^2 + (0.1)^2 - 2(0.006)

= 0.01 - 0.006 / 0.04 +0.01 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.05 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.038

= 0.105

Weight of A = 0.105

Weight of B= 1 - 0.105

Weight of B= 0.895

3 0
3 years ago
The McDonald's fast-food restaurant on campus sells an average of 4,000 quarter-pound hamburgers each week. Hamburger patties ar
san4es73 [151]

Answer: 11.42 times

Explanation:

Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Average inventory

Where,

Cost of goods sold = 4,000 quarter-pound hamburgers each week x $1.00 a pound

COGS = $4,000 per week

Average Inventory = 350 pounds of hamburger

Inventory Turnover = 4000 / 350 = 11.42 times

3 0
3 years ago
The Huffman Tire Company has 3,000 tires in its inventory which are considered obsolete. Each unit originally cost the company $
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

The correct answer is;

A $9,000 increase in profits (B)

Explanation:

This question is asking us to compare the net selling prices between selling to the current customers and selling to the car dealership, to determine if an increase or decrease in profit was made.

First of all, we have to calculate the net selling prices to the two group;

To the car dealership

price of 1 tire = $30

total number of tires = 3,000

Therefore total price of sales = 3000 × 30 = $90,000

To the current customers;

price of 1 tire = $45 - $10 rebate = $35

Number of tires = 3000

Therefore total selling price = 35 × 3000 = $105,000

Next, we are told that when they decide to sell to direct customers,  the program would cost $24,000. This amount will be removed from the total selling price; Therefore net amount gotten from sales to customers

= $105,000 - $24,000 (cost of program) = $81,000

Now, comparing the prices of the two groups,

Total sale to car dealership = $90,000

Total sales to customers = $81,000

difference = 90,000 - 81,000 = $9,000.

If the company makes a decision to sell to the car dealership, they will make a $9,000 increase in profit (Option B), because the price in selling to the car dealership is higher than that in selling to the direct customers by $9,000.

4 0
3 years ago
Internal Controls for Bank Lending
julsineya [31]

Answer:

1. False

The higher the figure, the higher the risk. Kindly note that loans are usually insured against default. The higher the amount insured, the higher the premium payable as insurance on such amounts.

2. False

It does not make for good internal control to have one person regardless of their position to have the final say on loans of great magnitude such as $5 Million. This can quickly degenerate into a situation where the officer involved is tempted to abuse that power. It makes for good corporate governance and risk management to ensure that the board is responsible for loans of such magnitude.

3. True

If a bank lost $100 in a thousand places, from loan default, that translates to a loss of $100,000. This relatively is large however it is small and will have less impact that a loss of a million dollars in 3 places. That's $ 3,000,000.

As already indicated, it makes for good loan disbursement governance, to ensure that there is at least two persons involved in the risk acceptance criteria (RAC) evaluation and loan disbursement process.

4. False

Separation of duties is the foundation of good internal control. It allows for greater objectivity. It is also key to carefully select signatories to loan disbursements. They have to be people of impeccable character and the company must exercise proper risk management to ensure that every protocol such as opportunity that may create the impulse or inclination to breach policy is removed completely.

Cheers!

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is true of someone with a low credit score? I. They probably make on time payments. II. They may not be able to rent the a
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these is a disadvantage of banking with national retail banks? they have small atm networks. they charge fees for many
    5·2 answers
  • The management of Blue Ocean Company estimates that 50,000 machine-hours will be required to support the production planned for
    11·1 answer
  • In evaluating companies across industries, financial managers will often read the _____ as a means of interpreting the statement
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of work?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statement(s) is(are) true regarding the variance of a portfolio of two risky securities? I) The higher th
    6·1 answer
  • Which font attribute would be most appropriate to make a papers heading stand out?
    11·1 answer
  • Shamrock Corp. has a deferred tax asset account with a balance of $76,000 at the end of 2019 due to a single cumulative temporar
    9·1 answer
  • Lawson Furniture purchased land, paying $65,000 cash and signing a $250,000 note payable. In addition, Lawson paid delinquent pr
    10·1 answer
  • Financial markets:____________.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!