1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babymother [125]
4 years ago
12

A historian is examining religions role in history which question might this historian ask if she were organizing her study by p

eriod
History
1 answer:
stira [4]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is how did the role of a religion which is in Europe changed between modern eras and postclassical?

Historian is termed as a researcher on a scholar who uses wide range of sources, techniques and tools to understand the past and how people and society they have changed.

They divided times and periods where similar events they do take place.

You might be interested in
What are some potential benefits and potential costs of total war, and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs ?
dimaraw [331]

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:

  • There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
  • Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
  • Countries with a strong military can use their full power.

However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:

  • Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
  • The destruction of all civil society.
  • Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
  • Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
  • Complete depletion of the country's resources.
  • Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
  • Closes the door to any peaceful solution.

There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who had a greater impact on industrial development, Samuel Slater or Eli Whitney? Defend your answer.
shepuryov [24]

The person who had a greater impact on industrial development in the U.S., was <u>Samuel Slater</u> <em>(Who was born in England in June 9, 1768  and died in April 21, 1835)</em>, because He was a pioneer in the American Industrial Development that took the British textile technology and the machinery designs and brought them to the United States, and with that industrial system and the machines, he created the first textile factories of North america, and began a business in that industry with his sons. <u>And thanks to that, it was generated an increase and an enhance in the U.S. industrial development, which caused that U.S became in one of the most industrialized nation.</u> So for that reason, <u>Samuel Slater was known as the "Father of the American Factory System".</u>

But by other side, although Eli Whitney contributed to the U.S. Industrial Revolution with the invention of the cotton gin, however, he wasn't founded the pillars of the Industrial Development of the U.S., as Samuel Slater did it.

So, according to the previous, <u>the right answer is Samuel Slater.</u>

4 0
3 years ago
Why was june 1940 a good time for hitler to try to invade britain?
IgorLugansk [536]
Because France was occupied and Britain stood alone
3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!! GIVING BRAINLISTS
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

What was the most important reason for Alexander's ability to build such a large empire?

1.Alexander the Great's empire developed not only because of his military prowess but also because of his father's success, which took advantage of an unstable political context in Greece.

Alexander's background:

Alexander the Great, also known as Alexander III or Alexander of Macedonia, (born 356 BCE, Pella, Macedonia [northwest of Thessaloníki, Greece]—died June 13, 323 BCE, Babylon [near Al-Ḥillah, Iraq]), king of Macedonia (336–323 BCE), who overthrew the Persian empire, carried Macedonian arms to India, and laid the foundations for the Hellenistic world of territorial kingdoms. Already in his lifetime the subject of fabulous stories, he later became the hero of a full-scale legend bearing only the sketchiest resemblance to his historical career.

Alexander's early career:

Alexander received his earliest education under the tutelage of his relative, the stern Leonidas of Epirus. ... Alexander completed his education at Meiza in 340 B.C. A year later, while still just a teen, he became a soldier and embarked on his first military expedition, against the Thracian tribes.

Alexander built his empire by:

After three grueling years of warfare and three decisive battles, Alexander smashed the Persian armies at the Tigris River and conquered the mighty Persian Empire, including the legendary city of Babylon. ... While fighting the Persians, Alexander conquered Egypt and founded a city at the mouth of the Nile River.

Alexander kept his empire running by:

He led important campaigns and expanded his empire from Greece to Persia, Babylon, Egypt and beyond, taking advantage of local political contexts as he conquered new territory. ... Perhaps the greatest effect of his empire was the spread of Greek culture through the successor empires that long outlasted Alexander's rule.

Alexander's empire collapsed when:

Alexander's death was sudden and his empire disintegrated into a 40-year period of war and chaos in 321 BCE. The Hellenistic world eventually settled into four stable power blocks: the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, the Seleucid Empire in the east, the Kingdom of Pergamon in Asia Minor, and Macedon.

Hope this helps!!! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Explain how the military strategy of flexible response contributed to the significant increases in U.S. defense spending of the
never [62]

Answer: The flexible answer required more money.

Explanation:

During the 1960s, the US continued to expand its strategic goals and invest in conventional military forces. The flexible answer also involved seeking partners in third world countries.

To this end, financial assistance was provided to governments that did not favor the communist regime. So the flexible answer was not to spend money on the military but to strengthen the position in the world. As a result, the US found itself at a much higher cost.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • McCarthyism was an overzealous attempt to destroy in America.
    12·2 answers
  • Why might religion have an important effect on future history?
    5·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, what route did pioneers follow to settle the Pacific Coast?<br> the Mississippi River
    12·2 answers
  • 0.31587 is rational?
    15·1 answer
  • Which activity was central to process of learning that was developed during the Scientific Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • ANSWER QUICK PLS!!
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following didn’t occur during the cenezoic era
    7·1 answer
  • An economic exchange in which all sides agree to participate because they expect to<br> benefit is?
    9·1 answer
  • What work, trades and crafts did Native Americans practice at the missions?​
    8·1 answer
  • when Romanian gynecologist Gisella perl realized I didn't see it wanted to do with pregnant prisoners, how did she work against
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!