Answer:
The answer is: D) ethnocentric staffing model
Explanation:
Ethnocentric staffing model: involves hiring expatriates from the company´s home country to fill the most important positions in foreign subsidiaries. This usually happens within multinational corporations where a current employee working in the headquarter´s office gets transferred to a foreign subsidiary.
The main advantage of this approach is that expats should be better aligned with the interests and perspective of the home office. On the other hand, the main disadvantage is that the company loses local perspective and insights.
Answer:
A) Strengths
Explanation:
Having one of the best teams or a coach as the distinguished major-league player is the strength of the TEAM. This is the internal and growing strengths of the team players.This is a learning strength and can be used in every possible way to improve results or outputs. This is neither a weakness nor a threat.
Having the best players is the uniqueness of the team and having a coach as the distinguished major-league player is the strong management of the team where expert handles training.
Answer:
$1,800,000
Explanation:
Equity which represents the amount owed to the owners of the business includes retained earnings (which is the accumulation of the net income/loss over the years less dividends paid) and common shares.
Ending retained earnings = Beginning retained earnings + additional stock issued + net income - dividend paid
= $651000 + $1017000 + $649000 - $376000 - $141000
= $1,800,000
It has significantly decreased
Answer:
For the Economist A the spending multiplier is = 8, the tax multiplier = 4, the increase in spending is = $4 billion, the tax cut is = $8 billion.
For the Economist B, the spending multiplier is =4, the tax multiplier = 2, the increase in spending is = $8 billion, the tax cut is = $16 billion.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(1)The Economist A
The Spending multiplier = 8
In closing the output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 8 = $4 billion
Thus,
The tax multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
(2)The Economist B
Now,
The spending multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
So,
Tax multiplier = 2
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 2 = $16 billion