Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

6

Once mylie's total utility begins to decrease, does each additional singing of the song hurt more than the previous one or less

than the previous one?

1 answer:

True [87]2 years ago

6 0

When total utility starts to decrease, each additional song hurts MORE than the previous song.

You might be interested in

The rate established at the beginning of a period that uses estimated overhead and an allocation factor such as estimated direct

Bumek [7]

Answer:

Predetermined overhead rate

Explanation:

The predetermined overhead rate is the rate that is computed by taking the estimated manufacturing overhead and the same would be divided by allocation factor that could be estimated direct labor, estimated direct hours, etc in order to assign the overhead cost

So according to the given situation, the first option is correct i.e. predetermined overhead rate

5 0

3 years ago

Consider the following limit order book for a share of stock. The last trade in the stock occurred at a price of $70. Limit Buy

harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

<u><em>$69.80</em></u>

Explanation:

Note, a market order is an order designed to execute an order immediately by <em>matching the best available price</em> on the sell order list.

When we look carefully at the sell order book, we observe that the only sell order containing the specified quantity of 120 units of shares at a price close to the market price is <u>$69.80.</u> Even though there are other cheaper orders are available, their order quantity does <em>not </em>match the market buy order for the 120 shares and thus would not be filled.

7 0

2 years ago

9-10. Armstrong Inc. is a calendar-year corporation. Its financial statements for the years ended 12/31/14 and 12/31/15 containe

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Consider the following explanation

Explanation:

If these error are nit corrected, the income before taxes be overstated by $ 35,000 .

As, Overstatement of Ending Inventory will affect the gross profit (Increase) by $ 25,000 and then understatement of Depreciation will further increase Net Profit by $ 10,000

5 0

2 years ago

You are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scal

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

a. The optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0)

b. Yes, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Explanation:

a. Determine your optimal pricing strategy if you and your rival believe that the new Highlander is a "special edition" that will be sold only for one year.

Note: See the attached excel file for the Representation of one shot normal for of the game played between "You" and "Your Rival" together with the payoffs.

From the attached excel file, the dominant strategy is for “You” and “Your Rival” to charge “Low Price” each. If the dominant strategy is played by “You” and “Your Rival”, the optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0).

b. Would your answer differ if you and your rival were required to resubmit price quotes year after year and if, in any given year, there was a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander? Explain.

When we have a year-after-year competition between “You” and “Your Rival” but with a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander, the payoffs of the firm that continue to comply with the collusive strategy of charging “High Price” by each firm under the normal trigger strategy whereby “You” and “Your Rival” agree to charge high price as long as there is no past deviation by any of the firm, otherwise charge a low price is as follows:

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 + $6(100% - 60%) + $6(100% - 60%)^2 + 6(100% - 60%)^2 …….

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 / 6% = $10

Therefore, what the firm that cheats earn today is $11 million and it earns $0 forever. The implication of this is that $\pi ^{Cheat}$ = $11

Therefore, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

7 0

2 years ago

The reasons for using the variable-cost approach include all of the following except this approach provides the most defensible

Ber [7]

Answer:

The reasons for using the variable-cost approach include all of the following except

this approach provides the most defensible bases for justifying prices to all interested parties.

Explanation:

This is not part of the reasons for using the variable-cost approach. But options b, c, and d are certainly the reasons why the variable-cost approach is used. The variable-cost approach provides a differential analysis for decision-making. It assigns overhead costs to the period in which they are incurred, while other variable costs are assigned to the merchandise produced within that period. Thus, by excluding fixed manufacturing overhead cost, only the direct costs associated with production are used in accounting for the product's costs.

3 0

3 years ago