Ranger says the expression is not in its simplest form. He thinks the two terms need to be combined. Is Ranger right that 8x − 2

Question

raketka [301]

3 years ago

14

Ranger says the expression is not in its simplest form. He thinks the two terms need to be combined. Is Ranger right that 8x − 2

0 can be simplified further? Provide support for your response.

Mathematics

2 answers:

cricket20 [7] · Answer 1 · 2022-06-15T19:54:30+03:00

Answer :
Ranger is incorrect. The expression, 8x<span> – 20, is in its simplest form because there are no parentheses and no like terms. The two terms cannot be combined because only one term has </span>x<span> as its variable.
</span>
I did it and got it right
hope it help
~Reema

8_murik_8 [283] · Answer 2 · 2022-06-15T21:02:13+03:00

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Sample Answer: Ranger is incorrect. The expression, 8x – 20, is in its simplest form because there are no parentheses and no like terms. The two terms cannot be combined because only one term has x as its variable.