1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
15

According to this quote why did people flee the Congo ?

History
2 answers:
liraira [26]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

They fled to escape persecution from government soldiers.

Andre45 [30]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: the 2nd option

Explanation:

i just finished “the casement report”

You might be interested in
How many Anglo-Saxon kingdoms were there in modern-day England?
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

FOUR (4)

Explanation:

The four main kingdoms in Anglo-Saxon England were: East Anglia. Mercia. Northumbria, including sub-kingdoms Bernicia and Deira.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer and Explanation:

Bradstreet has an aggressive and negative view of the North American indigenous people, he believes that they are savage, violent, uncivilized and that they must be fought in the name of the goals of the English. He believes that the Indians are oppressive and that this should not be tolerated. He believes that the Indians will unite against England and for that reason it is necessary to be prepared. Probably, this view that Bradstreet has towards indigenous people comes from bad experiences he had with the tribes, as well as an imperialist thought full of prejudices and a strong racism and intolerance.

Johnson, on the other hand, although he believes that indigenous people are uncivilized, he believes that working for them will be more profitable for the English, than fighting them. He believes that indigenous people are a fascinating people and that they have dominion over the lands that the English are taking over. Even in the midst of this, the Indians are willing to divide the land and for this they make small demands that can easily be met by the English, establishing harmony with all peoples. Johnson's view comes from the humanistic character and the peaceful nature that he possessed.

3 0
3 years ago
Ranchers had problems with keeping cattle because of theives? true or false
horsena [70]
The answer is True Hope this helps! :D
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the political significance of the great compromise and the three-fifths compromise?
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.

<u>The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South.</u> For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,

8 0
3 years ago
Wht are significance of French revolution?<br>​
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

World War One, the French Revolution is the most important period in modern European history.

Explanation:

The Revolution birthed the modern nation state. It ended the last vestiges of feudalism in Western and Central Europe. It spread Enlightenment ideas across Europe.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did Hawaii have to do with US plans involving Asia?
    13·1 answer
  • 2. Portugal and Spain were rivals in the exploration of the seas. State two reasons why both nations were sending out voyages of
    10·1 answer
  • Select the two men who headed the Axis powers of Germany and Italy in World War II. Mussolini Hitler Hirohito Truman Stalin
    9·2 answers
  • What reason did the Soviet Union give for its expansion after world war two?
    10·1 answer
  • Whats the term for a work situation in which other co workers focuses on a single speaking task in the production process?
    15·1 answer
  • How are the chesapeake and new england coloinies different politically?
    9·1 answer
  • How did a new European civilization develop after the fall of the Rome empire?
    8·1 answer
  • What were the American advantages in the Revolutionary War and why was George Washington selected as the best person to make the
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following sentences best supports the idea that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was determined? Choose two.
    7·1 answer
  • Why was there more carbon-14 in the germinated seed?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!