9514 1404 393
Answer:
x = 7
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation can be rewritten to ...
8x = 13n +4 . . . . for some integers x and n
x = (13n +4)/8
For x to be an integer, 13n must be an odd multiple of 4. Since 13 is an odd number, n=4 will do.
x = (13·4 +4)/8 = 56/8
x = 7
__
The graph shows a "trial and error" method of solution. Only values of x less than 13 need to be examined.
Answer:
bro tbh just use like or
Step-by-step explanation:
its not that deep
Answer:bet
Step-by-step explanation: I would but I’m not smart enough
Answer:
maybe
Step-by-step explanation:
Dora is apparently assuming the dimensions are integers. In that case she is correct.
If the dimensions are unconstrained, the perimeter will be largest when a pair of opposite sides will be the smallest measure allowed.
For some perimeter P and side length x, the area is ...
A = x(P/2 -x)
Conversely, the perimeter for a given area is ...
P = 2(A/x +x)
This gets very large when x gets very small, so Dora is correct in saying that the side lengths that are as small as they can be will result in the largest perimeter. We have no way of telling if her assumption of integer side lengths is appropriate. If it is not, her statement makes no sense.
