Answer:
The Hunger Games is told in first person
If i'm right, please mark me brainliest ! (๑・ω-)～♥”
Topic: Decision on traveling to Mars
Source 1: Alexander Fisher
Evidence 1: "Mars is the most likely planet for us to colonize"
Evidence 2: "The technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth."
Evidence 3: "Studies have shown that radiation levels on Mars are not lethal to humans. Sure, we would have to live in a dome at first, but over time, we could use science to change the atmosphere and make it possible to go outside, just like on Earth!"
Source 2: Juniper Springs
Evidence 1: "...it is too dangerous. The atmosphere of the planet is more carbon dioxide than oxygen, and it’s very cold.
Evidence 2: "Also, going to Mars would be very expensive."
Evidence 3: "that does not mean they aren't dangerous." "It is foolish to think a dome would be able to protect us from all of the radiation."
Answer:
A. The mandate that high school seniors at Central High volunteer for a public service project is a welcome change to the high school graduation requirement.
Explanation:
Option A is the best choice for the conclusion paragraph. It restates the claim, but doesn't summarize the entire essay. The conclusion paragraph should summarize the entire essay, but not in the first sentence. Options B and C add in extra information. Conclusions should not add new facts or details, but rather remind the reader of those most important to proving the claim correct.
- We know the answer is not A, because you generally do not want to support meat for a vegetarian publication.
- We know the answer is not B, because triple chocolate donuts have nothing to due with "Muscle Builders Weekly."
- We know the answer in not C, because you are probably not looking for dating ads if you are already married.
- The answer is D, because it is reasonable to explain pet grooming for a publication for pet lovers.
