Answer:
Cost recovered from driver = $49500
Explanation:
Since the owner suffered $10000 damage
The passenger suffered$100000 damage
Jury determined that driver should carry 45% of the damages
So therefore;
Total cost of damages = 100000 + 10000 = $ 110000
Cost of damage injured by driver = (45/100) * $110000 = $49500
I think A)People had more time for face to face contact
You could try the word “apparent” - it’s a synonym to evident and definitely fits in the second blank. If all else fails, search up “synonyms to evident” and choose as you like. I hope this helps :)
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.