1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arada [10]
3 years ago
15

What was the Great Society and how did it compare to previous programs? Did it make a significant impact?

History
1 answer:
Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago
5 0

The great society was a set of programs that President Lyndon Johnson launched. The goal of the program to eradicate poverty and racial injustice. It was different than other programs because it would have an acceleration of governmental efforts to provide wellness to citizens by equalizing opportunity for minorities, eliminate social and economic inequality and deprivation.

The program had a large impact. It increased Social Security benefits, aided the elderly poor, instituted health care supports such as Medicare and Medicaid, it assisted African Americans to increase their incomes, and the percentage of families that lived in poverty declined.

You might be interested in
Why did the Whiskey Rebellion occur in western Pennsylvania in 1794
Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

is b: farmers refused to pay an excise tax that congress had placed on whiskey

8 0
2 years ago
10 points I NEED HELP https://brainly.com/question/10133959
diamong [38]
10 points I NEED HELP brainly.com/question/10133959


imma try tod o it
3 0
3 years ago
What was the main reason why it was more expensive to operate a school system in the South than in the North?
Andreas93 [3]

Because the policy of segregation practiced in the south.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Communism is the political-economic system created by Lenin in the country of
Elden [556K]

Answer:

Russia

Explanation:

Brainliest?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why wasn’t there unanimous support for the proposed US Constitution which was presented during the constitutional convention in
    13·1 answer
  • Which action led most directly to divisions in Christianity in western countries Europe
    13·1 answer
  • Write a creative poem about art for 50 points.
    7·1 answer
  • I 1. Why do you think early settlements in the Americas were founded on or near bodies of water?​
    8·1 answer
  • A teen's risk of being involved in a crash is heaviest ___________a. on school days.
    6·2 answers
  • 2. How did Martha Washington feel about the role she filled as the nation's hostess?
    11·1 answer
  • In a well developed paragraph using examples from the text answer the following question: How did the Etruscans and the Greeks i
    14·1 answer
  • Why the Legislative Branch is the most unpopular branch of government
    14·2 answers
  • What happened in 395 C.E after Theodosius died?
    10·1 answer
  • Who is he targeting and What is the message
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!