Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
They may want to appear just as the way the bodies look in an advertisement. And if the bodies are unhealthy bodies in the advertisements then that would be a negative reaction to the advertisement.
this question is incomplete but I have added The Answer options to your question
a) He does not have a hypothesis.
b) He only has one group. He has not established a comparison
c) He has not measured an outcome.
d) The groups were not equal to begin with.
Answer:
b) He only has one group. He has not established a comparison
Explanation:
A randomized controlled experiment can be defined as an experiment that has two groups which it randomly assigns participants to.
These two groups are:
1.) the experimental group and
2.) The controlled group on whom the study is being performed.
Now Alberti does not have any of these groups we have listed. He performed the testing on the same people before they consumed alcohol and after they consumed alcohol. Therefore this study was not comparative in nature.
Hi there! Most food label percentages are based of of a *2000* calorie a day diet. Since that is the average amount of calories an average person consumes daily or a normal diet. Hope this helps, and have a lovely day!!
A food handler should stop working until it has no more signs of infection. Or wear long gloves that go up their arms. I hope this is what you want.
