Answer:
I think the word <u>ethic</u> is the answer.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
A fast food restaurant
Explanation:
it would give the appearance of impropriety if the effects were positive which would make the results questionable to others.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
They put there own personal beliefs into the event and how they feel.