1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serious [3.7K]
3 years ago
9

What significant population shifts occurred during world war 2?

History
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
8 0

The significant population where shifting has occurred during the war is the California, wherein the people residing on it were heavily populated that many of the people who used to live their moved to the NE, to reduce the population size.

You might be interested in
In witchcraft in Salem, how does fear drive action?
alexdok [17]

Explanation:

Fear drove action, because instead of acting in a just way which they would regualry do in a court trial, they acted unreasonably because they were scared. Many people died simply because they were <em>scared</em> that they were witches. Their fear drove them to the action of killing many inncoent people.

7 0
3 years ago
Black Codes was a name given to laws passed by southern governments established during the presidency of Andrew Johnson. These l
Arturiano [62]

Answer:Limit the effects of reconstruction amendments

6 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court support through their decisions in the case Plessy v. Ferguson 1886?
aev [14]

Answer:

Segregation, by supporting the idea of "separate but equal"

Explanation:

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

5 0
2 years ago
The us responded to Japan's expansion into China and French indochina in the 1930s by
Vlad1618 [11]

placing an embargo on all shipments to Japan!

hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why could the British restriction of trade be considered a violation of natural rights?
aliina [53]
The british restriction of trade could be considered a violation of human rights because the restrictions interfere with individual pursuit of economic interest.

The british restriction of trade gave the power for the Government to limit the type and the amount of Goods that could be traded that will benefit the Government itself

hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened with the equal rights amendment
    10·1 answer
  • In its early stages, the women’s rights movement was attached to the
    8·1 answer
  • Which African American was a scientist and gifted inventor who developed hundreds of uses for peanuts, pecans, sweet potatoes, a
    6·2 answers
  • I'm learning about history and I have a question. Why does Frederick Douglass look like Morgan Freeman?
    6·1 answer
  • Can you help me find the reasons they moved to the west and hardships they faced
    12·1 answer
  • Pls help should Columbus Day be celebrated (yes or no) and why ?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the Adams administration pass the Alien and Sedition Acts?
    7·2 answers
  • The colonists’ slogan, “No taxation without representation,” expresses a belief in
    14·1 answer
  • Pontiac, who led the indians against the colonists and british troops, was a(n) __________ chief.
    15·1 answer
  • Why were snails important to the Phoenician economy?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!