Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
Answer: For every Transaction between a buyer or a seller, a block is created and shared to a network of nodes where it becomes part of a blockchain
Explanation:
Answer: 1.5 billion people speak English.
Explanation:
The second option is definitely more complicated
<span>Weaver also claims that “a majority of seat belt violations” are the fault of the under-21 crowd.
</span><span>That is, we know the police have their eye on the teenagers, but are they looking at the adults as well?
</span><span>Like anybody who is inexperienced, the teenage driver must suffer through a legitimate period of self-doubt and skills acquisition.
Thats all i could find</span>
