Answer:
the amount have in 25 years is $317,628
Explanation:
The computation of the amount have in 25 years is shown below:
PMT = Payment saved per year
= $3,000 + $750
= $3,750.00
N = Periods of payment = 25 years
R = Rate = 9%
Now the formula is
FV = (PMT × ((1 + R)^N-1) ÷ (R)
= $3,750 × ((1 + 9%)^25-1) ÷ (9%)
= $317,628
Hence, the amount have in 25 years is $317,628
Answer:
The remaining useful life of the asset is = 10 - 3 = 7 years
Explanation:
The straight line method of depreciation charges a constant depreciation expense through out the useful life of the asset. The formula for depreciation expense under this method is,
Depreciation expense = (Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated useful life of the asset
Plugging in the values for depreciation expense per year, cost and salvage value, we can calculate the total expected life of the asset.
5000 = (53000 - 3000) / estimated useful life of the asset
estimated useful life of the asset = 50000 / 5000
estimated useful life of the asset = 10 years
As the accumulated depreciation balance is of 15000, the depreciation for 15000/5000 = 3years has been charged.
The remaining useful life of the asset is = 10 - 3 = 7 years
The inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given.
In this case, the inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
harry should add $20 per pound
The method of identifying the advantages and disadvantages of various options by looking at the incremental impact on total revenue and total cost caused by a very modest change in the value or input of each alternative (just one unit). Instead of making decisions based on totals or averages, marginal analysis encourages those that focus on small or gradual changes to resources. Examining the costs and possible gains of particular business operations or financial choices is known as marginal analysis. The objective is to ascertain whether the benefits from the change in activity will be great enough to outweigh the costs.
To know more about marginal analysis refer to brainly.com/question/7412432
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. $800
Explanation:
Ana Co.
Sales $500,000
Accounts Receivable $40,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts $300 Credit
Bad Debts Expense = 2 % of $ 40,000= $ 800
The adjusting entry would be
Bad Debts Expense $ 800 Dr.
Allowance for doubtful accounts $800 Credit
As we already have a credit balance of $ 300 in the doubtful accounts we will increase it with an amount of $ 500.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $ 500 Debit
Account Receivable $ 500 Credit
