This would fall under the 9th ammendment because the 9th ammednment says that there are other rights than the ones that are mentioned in the document . I hope thi helps :}
I’m pretty sure the answer is D :)
Answer:
The winning side had more industrial capabilities, more efficient logistical support, greater naval power, and had a larger population of people fighting.
Answer:
Dr. Ingram conducted an C. experimental study.
Explanation:
An experimental study is that in which the variables are in direct control of the researcher. He/she is in control of <em>changing or adjusting</em> them in order to reach an outcome.
Dr. Ingram <em>varied the imageability of items </em>on a list to measure the participants' recalling abilities. He is conducting an experimental study.
Let's see why the other options are not valid in this case:
- A correlational study tries to find correlations between 2 or more variables.
- In a naturalistic study the researcher observes a certain phenomenon.
- An observational study just centers on observing, there is no manipulation of variables.